![]() ![]() Suppose PFBlockerNG has in their blacklist. makes calls to, which has a CNAME entry for. If changes their domain, then naturally PFBlockerNG needs to update their list. PFBlockerNG returns 172.16.0.1 (or whatever) for a DNS lookup of because is on the blacklist. By your logic you shouldn't bother with PFBlockerNG It is no more easily circumvented than PFBlockerNG blocking non CNAME cloaked subdomains by lists. I don't have any experience with VLANs but I'd imagine you just need to apply these rules for your multiple VLANs. (Do the same on TCP port 853 for DNS over TLS). Take UDP traffic from the LAN interface that doesn't match (use the invert match checkbox) the AdGuard DNS IP, with a destination of any IP address and port 53, and redirect it to a target IP of your AdGuard DNS server with a target port of 53. You can accomplish this by creating a NAT port forwarding rule. What I would recommend instead is to reroute all DNS traffic that is destined for external DNS servers to your AdGuard DNS server. These rules should be placed at or near the top of your firewall rules list so that they are not bypassed by other rules. You should repeat this rule for port 853 to block external DNS over TLS traffic. If you truly want to just outright block all external DNS, then you need to create a new LAN firewall rule that says any traffic not from the AdGuard DNS IP (use the invert match checkbox) that has a destination of any IP address and port 53 should be blocked. These next steps are only necessary in achieving that goal. You specifically said you want to block all external DNS. I'm also going to assume you're going to leave your PFSense router as your DHCP server.įirst step is to change the DNS server in your DHCP server settings so that all DHCP clients get handed the AdGuard DNS IP. r/pfblockerng /r/sysadmin /r/networking /r/homelab /r/homenetworkingīased on "block external DNS" I'm going to assuming that your AdGuard DNS server is set up in your LAN. This is a community subreddit so lets try and keep the discourse polite. ![]() This subreddit is primarily for the community to help each other out, if you have something you want the maintainers of the project to see we recommend posting in the appropriate category on our Netgate forum. If you are looking to sell or buy used hardware, please try /r/hardwareswap. If you are looking for help with basic networking concepts, please try /r/homelab or for more advanced, /r/networking.ĭo not post items for sale in this subreddit. Use a search engine like Google to search across the domain: We have a great community that helps support each other, but we also provide 24x7 commercial support.īefore asking for help please do the following: You can install the software yourself on your own hardware. You can buy official pfSense appliances directly from Netgate or a Netgate Partner. What for -s install support, we're using and it currently does not support rc.dThe pfSense project is a free, open source tailored version of FreeBSD for use as a firewall and router with an easy-to-use web interface. If we cannot maintain packages on our own, we should at least make it easier for others to do. There are a lot of people who prefer using package managers. ![]() I actually think it makes sense to support both approaches. I think the most interesting thing is to focus on a centralized installation form, like AdGuardHome -s install, something that works on both Linux, Windows, macOS, and FreeBSD Well as far as i can tell, the package does not include an rc script so you still need to use that from are receiving this because you commented.ĭata: terça-feira, 19 de maio de 2020 19:01 You can't make this door package working properly, you may be missing something, but it doesn't work. However, I was unable to install AdGuardHome using ports/pkg, in a concise and interactive way, there is no official valid documentation that instructs users to do this, neither from the AdGuardHome team nor from the FreeBSD community.ĭata: terça-feira, 19 de maio de 2020 06:16ĪdGuardHome is also included in the FreeBSD Ports collection so you can simply Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe. You are receiving this because you commented. There's an ongoing discussion about Arch Linux packaging: #1324 I wonder can we do something to make packaging possible? If you want, you can include that in the source code.ĭata: terça-feira, 19 de maio de 2020 05:34Īssunto: Re: Installation on FreeBSD instruction ( #1352) I think the most interesting thing is to focus on a centralized installation form, like AdGuardHome -s install, something that works on both Linux, Windows, macOS, and FreeBSD. I understand, but in that case, what kind of maintainer, no? ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |